4,491 research outputs found

    Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, Populations on Gulf of Alaska Seamounts

    Get PDF
    Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, were tagged and released on Gulf of Alaska seamounts during 1999–2002 to determine the extent, if any, of emigration from the seamounts back to the continental slope and of movement between seamounts. Seventeen sablefish from Gulf of Alaska seamounts have been recovered on the continental slope since tagging began, verifying that seamount to slope migration occurs. Forty-two sablefish were recovered on the same seamounts where they were tagged, and none have been recaptured on seamounts other than the ones where they were released. Sablefish populations on Gulf of Alaska seamounts are made up of individuals mostly older than 5 years and are maledominant, with sex ratios varying from 4:1 up to 10:1 males to females. Males are smaller than females, but the average age of males is greater than that of females, and males have a greater range of age (4–64 yr) than females (4–48 yr). Otoliths of seamount fish frequently have an area of highly compressed annuli, known as the transition zone, where growth has suddenly and greatly slowed or even stopped. Because transition zones can be present in both younger and older seamount fish and are rare in slope fish, formation of otolith transition zones may be related to travel to the seamounts. The route sablefish use to reach the seamounts is so far unknown. One possibility is that fish enter the eastward-flowing North Pacific Current off the Aleutian Islands or western Gulf of Alaska and travel more or less passively on the current until encountering a seamount. The route from seamount back to slope would likely be the northwardflowing Alaska Current. These routes are discussed in light of tag recovery locations of slope- and seamount-tagged fish

    Late Night at LDs

    Full text link
    As I am giving my full attention to the Western omelet, home fries, and rye toast on my plate, I do not notice what is going on around me. I’m not drunk, but I’m not sober either. I’m with some friends I know well and some people I barely know, but they all seem nice enough to share a late night meal. I’m starving. I start to realize that more and more non-college students enter LDs, presumably local Gettysburg residents. Some are being loud and boisterous, not unlike many of the people sitting at my very own table, and someone offhand says, “fucking locals.” [excerpt

    Avalanches, thresholds, and diffusion in meso-scale amorphous plasticity

    Full text link
    We present results on a meso-scale model for amorphous matter in athermal, quasi-static (a-AQS), steady state shear flow. In particular, we perform a careful analysis of the scaling with the lateral system size, LL, of: i) statistics of individual relaxation events in terms of stress relaxation, SS, and individual event mean-squared displacement, MM, and the subsequent load increments, Δγ\Delta \gamma, required to initiate the next event; ii) static properties of the system encoded by x=σyσx=\sigma_y-\sigma, the distance of local stress values from threshold; and iii) long-time correlations and the emergence of diffusive behavior. For the event statistics, we find that the distribution of SS is similar to, but distinct from, the distribution of MM. We find a strong correlation between SS and MM for any particular event, with SMqS\sim M^{q} with q0.65q\approx 0.65. qq completely determines the scaling exponents for P(M)P(M) given those for P(S)P(S). For the distribution of local thresholds, we find P(x)P(x) is analytic at x=0x=0, and has a value P(x)x=0=p0\left. P(x)\right|_{x=0}=p_0 which scales with lateral system length as p0L0.6p_0\sim L^{-0.6}. Extreme value statistics arguments lead to a scaling relation between the exponents governing P(x)P(x) and those governing P(S)P(S). Finally, we study the long-time correlations via single-particle tracer statistics. The value of the diffusion coefficient is completely determined by Δγ\langle \Delta \gamma \rangle and the scaling properties of P(M)P(M) (in particular from M\langle M \rangle) rather than directly from P(S)P(S) as one might have naively guessed. Our results: i) further define the a-AQS universality class, ii) clarify the relation between avalanches of stress relaxation and diffusive behavior, iii) clarify the relation between local threshold distributions and event statistics

    Some Problems of Equity

    Get PDF
    corecore